Using data on foodstuff-claim frequency collected by Mintel Corporation, we located that “clean” claims – labels that stress absolutely nothing artificial has been added – are the swiftest-escalating classification in both equally France and the US.  ­­

“Enriched” promises are the minimum made use of, while “diet” promises grew likewise in equally countries. “Whole” statements like “wholesome” or “organic” grew more rapidly in France and are now the 2nd most well-liked class, whereas they remained in 3rd place in the US.

French match, US mismatch

We then took a closer seem at how this contrasts with buyer choices in each place. Although prior investigate has targeted on company behaviour or purchaser response, it is unusual to have equally in the same examine. 

We gathered and evaluated facts on customer tastes for these 4 types of promises from two samples of French and American buyers matched on age, gender, income and schooling concentrations. 

Our findings show that People in america prefer claims about the existence of excellent than about the absence of bad, as illustrated in the top still left chart.

French people, nevertheless, desire character-based mostly promises that the product is healthful mainly because its purely natural qualities have been preserved. This locating is presented in the base remaining chart wherever we see the inexperienced line (indicating preferences for mother nature-centered claims) is earlier mentioned the yellow line (nutrition-dependent promises).

These marked buyer choices need to make it straightforward for marketers to give people today what they want. We found this was the situation in France the place statements that people like most are also much more often used on cereal packaging. As a final result, the bottom correct chart, showing declare frequency, closely matches the bottom still left chart.

However, matters are completely different in the US, wherever there is a major mismatch amongst the promises that people today like and the claims that corporations are employing. The the very least-popular promises, those people about “diet”, are quite routinely made use of, although the favored statements about products becoming “enriched” are substantially significantly less repeated.

Why the US obtained it erroneous

To have an understanding of why there is this mismatch, we pooled details on business ownership. Our results recommend that public businesses make less wellbeing statements on their packaging than non-public organizations in equally nations and nevertheless have the maximum matching rates. This suggests that corporations can efficiently match shopper expectations devoid of creating numerous wellbeing claims if they are the proper ones.

When big cereal companies like Kellogg’s and Standard Mills industry their merchandise in the way American customers favor, we located that smaller, privately-owned providers are a lot more probably to use “diet” claims that people today like much less. In contrast, French privately-owned firms make the exact same sort of claims that general public corporations make.

We explored several hypotheses as to why private organizations are not advertising and marketing their solutions to satisfy consumers’ expectations. The 1 that we feel is plausible is that these more compact American corporations are pushed by a mission to increase the wellness of consumers, alternatively of just making health claims that buyers like. These firms are in simple fact executing what is much healthier, which is to take out salt, sugar and other additives.

We came to this summary by analysing the names of the privately-owned organizations. We noticed a larger proportion of people that have company names referencing nourishment or wellness, this sort of as “Low Karb”. This could reveal why these companies never give men and women what they want – they are concentrated on offering men and women what they should really consume, which is extra wholesome food. 

It is exciting to see that not all corporations are shopper-oriented in the way we presume them to be. They do not always target on what the market place needs. This could be since they are subsequent a area of interest strategy where by they only go right after little subsegments of people today who definitely want to get rid of weight.

Alternatively, it could be because they want to be the “good guys” and are likely earlier mentioned and outside of what shoppers want. What we are seeing in the US knowledge suggests that some smaller organizations realize they have a duty to provide extra nutritious solutions.

Redefining ‘healthy’ and other summary terms

It is difficult for companies when individuals are captivated to buzzwords like “natural”, “fresh” or “organic”, as these promises are not scientifically controlled and have no association with the dietary high-quality of the foodstuff. Food entrepreneurs want to understand how customers are decoding nutritious food, and continue to keep monitor of how these viewpoints change, even when they do not align with nourishment.

These conceptual, capture-all words lengthen further than the foodstuff marketplace. Practically each firm desires their item to be “cool” or “high quality”. Even so, these terms can be interpreted in numerous unique means. It is as a result significant to unpack what individuals suggest when they use these everyday terms. Generally, we imagine we fully grasp just about every other, but we are speaking about vastly distinct issues. 


Pierre Chandon is the L’Oréal Chaired Professor of Marketing – Innovation and Creative imagination at INSEAD and the Director of the INSEAD-Sorbonne Université Behavioural Lab. Check out his TEDxINSEAD talk on Epicurean nudges.

Romain Cadario is an Assistant Professor at the Rotterdam University of Management, Erasmus University.

INSEAD Awareness is now on LinkedIn. Join the discussion today.

Comply with INSEAD Understanding on Twitter and Facebook.